Idea: better agent-count selection and early stopping for multi-agent simulations #193
Sparse-Supernova
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
|
Well, I was about to write the same thing; the token burn was too high, so I was thinking maybe removing the less useful agents so as to reduce token burn but also limiting unnecessary depth of simulation. Quality over quantity works best here. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi MiroFish team,
I’ve been looking through MiroFish and really like the graph → persona → simulation → report flow.
I’m working on Sparse Supernova, including a public agreement/saturation model (USL) and a metric called FRAI, and I think it may be useful to MiroFish as a lightweight control layer around simulation rather than as a replacement for your architecture.
The practical idea is simple:
In plain terms: run the minimum simulation needed to reach decision-grade convergence instead of over-provisioning agents and rounds.
From your repo and workflow, the natural insertion points look like:
If useful, here is our paper's public link:
Happy to share a short integration note or a tiny reference implementation if that would help?
Great work, keep it up, Thanks
Sparse Bob - Low carbon Ai - I love Zeros
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions