Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Future of react-scaffolder #8

Open
rajikaimal opened this issue Sep 29, 2016 · 5 comments
Open

Future of react-scaffolder #8

rajikaimal opened this issue Sep 29, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@rajikaimal
Copy link
Contributor

rajikaimal commented Sep 29, 2016

Areas to discuss

  • What will be the future of react-scaffolder.
  • What features that needs to included.
  • Enhancements on existing features.
@shapkarin
Copy link
Collaborator

link with #65 #62
I really believe in #65. With that engine we can even allow users for example to use they own templates even from gists.

And also after #65 we can create separated project that can help create that kind of CLIs, scaffolder template engine or something. And use it with react-scaffolder and redux-scaffolder. it also about modularize #23

@rajikaimal rajikaimal changed the title Future of react-cli Future of react-scaffolder Jun 22, 2019
@rajikaimal
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is this similar to what Yeoman has done?

@shapkarin
Copy link
Collaborator

DIdn't know that. Cool. Yeoman also uses ejs

@rajikaimal
Copy link
Contributor Author

Does Yeoman match the requirements you had in your mind?

@shapkarin
Copy link
Collaborator

shapkarin commented Jun 22, 2019

Not sure, need to research, if I can use only yeoman better is support yeoman community with new scaffolders :-)
I’m just not sure if it can generate separated files, generate in the same solder that you run command or read files. Last feature I have in redux-scaffolder but not sure that it’s necessary. So if yeoman has first two features I’ll join yeoman

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants