Replies: 2 comments
-
Yeah this would be useful for local webpages and for testing. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Fixed by #95 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I am working around the basic authentication requirement for websockets with a python shim so that I can access the websocket from javascript in a local browser. It would be nice if there was an option to do basic authentication via the url instead of the http header. For example:
Current browsers do not support passing custom header information to websockets, and they are unlikely to ever allow it based on this SO post: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4361173/http-headers-in-websockets-client-api
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions