You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe:
Pull requests (PRs) are an integral part of collaborative development workflows. However, sometimes the significance of a PR or its context may not be immediately apparent to reviewers. This lack of context can lead to misunderstandings or delays in the review process.
Describe the solution you'd like:
I would like to see an automatic comment feature implemented that triggers whenever a new pull request is raised. This comment would provide essential context about the changes proposed in the PR, including details such as the purpose of the changes, any relevant issue or feature IDs, and any specific instructions for reviewers.
Describe alternatives you've considered:
One alternative could be manually adding context to each PR description. However, this approach is prone to oversight and may not be consistently applied across all PRs. Another option could be relying solely on the PR title or commit messages for context, but these may not always convey the full scope or intent of the changes.
Additional context:
Having an automatic comment added to each newly raised PR would streamline the review process by ensuring that reviewers have all the necessary information upfront, reducing the need for back-and-forth clarification. Additionally, it would improve transparency and accountability within the development team by documenting the rationale behind each set of changes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe:
Pull requests (PRs) are an integral part of collaborative development workflows. However, sometimes the significance of a PR or its context may not be immediately apparent to reviewers. This lack of context can lead to misunderstandings or delays in the review process.
Describe the solution you'd like:
I would like to see an automatic comment feature implemented that triggers whenever a new pull request is raised. This comment would provide essential context about the changes proposed in the PR, including details such as the purpose of the changes, any relevant issue or feature IDs, and any specific instructions for reviewers.
Describe alternatives you've considered:
One alternative could be manually adding context to each PR description. However, this approach is prone to oversight and may not be consistently applied across all PRs. Another option could be relying solely on the PR title or commit messages for context, but these may not always convey the full scope or intent of the changes.
Additional context:
Having an automatic comment added to each newly raised PR would streamline the review process by ensuring that reviewers have all the necessary information upfront, reducing the need for back-and-forth clarification. Additionally, it would improve transparency and accountability within the development team by documenting the rationale behind each set of changes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: