ociobakelut difference between 2.3.2 and 2.3.1 #1953
Labels
Bug
Unwanted or incorrect behavior in currently available functionality.
help wanted
Issues that the TSC has decided are worth implementing, but don't currently have the dev resources.
Hi all,
I'm using ociobakelut to convert a config-free .cube 33x33x33 LUT to .icc.
When I do this in 2.3.1 I get a good conversion.
When I do this in 2.3.2 the blacks are elevated.
The command I'm using is:
ociobakelut --lut {inputFile} --format icc {outputFile}
Here is how the curves of a resulting .icc profile created with version 2.3.1 look like:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/nnow10m5odvhnlfshmke8/Screenshot-2024-02-23-at-11.06.55.png?rlkey=wqcs4bsbj3vwvjr2ts3lsl2ds&dl=0
This is correct. They are identical to the .cube LUT.
Here is how the curves of the resulting .icc profile created with version 2.3.2 look like:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/jmfixgkdaqrdsn82lo1ef/Screenshot-2024-02-23-at-11.07.15.png?rlkey=c5wkwhmshdo5icmkprfphrpfm&dl=0
Notice the elevated blacks. This is incorrect.
Has something changed between 2.3.1 and 2.3.2 that I'm not aware of? I can't find anything in the changelog that would indicate this.
I should note that version 2.3.2 was installed via the Python method as per documentation, while 2.3.1 was installed from source.
Is this a bug?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: