Replies: 1 comment
-
Hi Pralad, Thanks for raising this, I think this feature does make a lot of sense. I would be happy to discuss this with you directly, preferably in a VC. Can you send me a pm on discord? Best, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hey @AntonOsika, @TheoMcCabe, @ATheorell!
I've been quite interested in using gpt-engineer in generating large codebases, but it does seem to struggle more often that what I would consider an "off-day". More often than not, the most common pattern I could notice was that of the LLM being "lazy" (providing higher-level steps/comments in place of concrete implementations). On a second run, things do improve but this isn't a structured way of running the tool. For the life of me, I thought I saw a similar argument in one of the discussions here (but I can't find it anymore) - adding more steps to gpt-engineer to piece together a big codebase, bit by bit, in an incremental fashion. Is that something that's being considered? Is someone already working on it? I would love to brainstorm strategies.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions