Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating package from 1.9.4 to 2.0.2 breaks the code #289

Open
Major-Mike opened this issue Jun 14, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Updating package from 1.9.4 to 2.0.2 breaks the code #289

Major-Mike opened this issue Jun 14, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@Major-Mike
Copy link

When we update the project from version 1.9.4 of the package to the 2.0.2 version, a lot of things break and I cannot find any reference to breaking changes that would cause this and wanted to know if anyone can explain what's going on and how to prevent this from happening.

image

Obviously the assembly references are there as are the proper using statements. As I stated, the code works fine with the older version and the moment you update, everything being the same, it breaks. Any assist would be appreciated as it is difficult to find any documentation that would explain this.

@JamalAPI
Copy link

May you are using deprecated methods. If not, remove the old references and add them again.

See https://github.com/AuthorizeNet/sdk-dotnet/releases.

@Major-Mike
Copy link
Author

Major-Mike commented Jun 14, 2021

Ok, your statement can be logical but to have that happen going up a minor version (yes I know 1 to 2 is not minor) but (.9 to 1.0) is and it shouldn't normally be enough to deprecate anything. But let's assume it has, where are the list of deprecated method, aka the breakage list? The releases pages has nothing that would explain this, so linking that is superfluous. Thanks.

This would be more useful, https://github.com/AuthorizeNet/sdk-dotnet/blob/master/MIGRATING.md, hopefully they have something looking through it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants