Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Device Compliance policy for ATP seems incredibly permissive #29

Open
ndss8989 opened this issue Jan 16, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Device Compliance policy for ATP seems incredibly permissive #29

ndss8989 opened this issue Jan 16, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@ndss8989
Copy link

The readme states:

Privileged Compliance ATP policy is used to feed the Threat Intelligence data from Microsoft Defender for Endpoint into the devices compliance state so its signals can be used as part of the Conditional Access evaluation process.

However it looks like the policy has very loose parameters i.e. all of these are false: passwordMinimumLength, defenderEnabled, activeFirewallRequired

Can anyone explain this?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ndss8989