Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Misplaced ASTs?... #745

Open
christinawlindberg opened this issue Nov 19, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Misplaced ASTs?... #745

christinawlindberg opened this issue Nov 19, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
artificial stars bug

Comments

@christinawlindberg
Copy link
Contributor

christinawlindberg commented Nov 19, 2021 •
edited
Loading

This is a reminder for me to investigate the potential placement of input ASTs, specifically in the edge cases where the fractional coverage area is less the 50%. I originally assumed that setting the fraction higher would just remove the tiles from the viable area for placing ASTs, but I have a suspicion (based on the image below) that all it's doing is setting the source density to 0.0 which shouldn't be happening.

16235_SMC-879ne-11082_inputAST_positions.pdf
@karllark
Copy link
Member

Yeah, that looks bad. So many ASTs near the edges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
artificial stars bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@karllark @christinawlindberg