You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, it may be necessary to incorporate a different dihedral definition for the glycosidic bonds (φ , ψ and ω angles) and χ (chi) angles.
In the case of the glycosidic bonds, it could be useful to have an option for selecting the preferred definition to use (NMR, crystallographic C+1 or crystallographic C-1), you can check the three possible definition in this table (the C+1 crystallographic style is useful for 1-1 bonds).
For the χ angles it's necessary to consider possible substituents, for example if a carbon has a N-acetil as subtituents the current definition used in the function set_chi it is not able to move the χ angle in that carbon (definition of NAc torsions, I have to search further to find a bibliographic reference). In the case of the ω when it behaves like a χ angle (i.e. there is no glycosidic bond 1-6), the definition of ω goes in the opposite direction to the one used in the above mentioned function, this is O5-C5-C6-O6 (definition taken from here [Experimental section - C. Theoretical Calculations], and used here).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, it may be necessary to incorporate a different dihedral definition for the glycosidic bonds (φ , ψ and ω angles) and χ (chi) angles.
In the case of the glycosidic bonds, it could be useful to have an option for selecting the preferred definition to use (NMR, crystallographic C+1 or crystallographic C-1), you can check the three possible definition in this table (the C+1 crystallographic style is useful for 1-1 bonds).
For the χ angles it's necessary to consider possible substituents, for example if a carbon has a N-acetil as subtituents the current definition used in the function
set_chi
it is not able to move the χ angle in that carbon (definition of NAc torsions, I have to search further to find a bibliographic reference). In the case of the ω when it behaves like a χ angle (i.e. there is no glycosidic bond 1-6), the definition of ω goes in the opposite direction to the one used in the above mentioned function, this is O5-C5-C6-O6 (definition taken from here [Experimental section - C. Theoretical Calculations], and used here).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: