You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Upon download and viewing the datasets https://physionet.org/content/bigideaslab-step-hr-smartwatch/1.0/. it appears that the majority of the sensors have <50% data compliance i.e., the columns have NaN values. Apple Watch has Max missing data. I wanted to inquire:
Difference/Inaccuracy in the HR from the ground truth ECG is one thing but missing almost 50% of that data is something that puzzles me. If so, is not the nearly 50% missing data a bigger problem than differences in HR from the round-truth ECG?
Regards
Devender
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On Jan 2, 2023, at 9:17 AM, Devender kumar ***@***.***> wrote:
Dear @brinnaebent,
I came across your paper 'Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors'. It was mentioned that https://physionet.org/content/bigideaslab-step-hr-smartwatch/1.0/ data was used in this analysis.
Upon download and viewing the datasets https://physionet.org/content/bigideaslab-step-hr-smartwatch/1.0/. it appears that the majority of the sensors have <50% data compliance i.e., the columns have NaN values. Apple Watch has Max missing data. I wanted to inquire:
Is the data used in the paper ''Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors' the same as https://physionet.org/content/bigideaslab-step-hr-smartwatch/1.0/ or is this a limited version of the full dataset used in the paper?
Difference/Inaccuracy in the HR from the ground truth ECG is one thing but missing almost 50% of that data is something that puzzles me. If so, is not the nearly 50% missing data a bigger problem than differences in HR from the round-truth ECG?
Regards
Devender
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Dear @brinnaebent,
I came across your paper 'Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors'. It was mentioned that https://physionet.org/content/bigideaslab-step-hr-smartwatch/1.0/ data was used in this analysis.
Upon download and viewing the datasets https://physionet.org/content/bigideaslab-step-hr-smartwatch/1.0/. it appears that the majority of the sensors have <50% data compliance i.e., the columns have NaN values. Apple Watch has Max missing data. I wanted to inquire:
Is the data used in the paper ''Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors' the same as https://physionet.org/content/bigideaslab-step-hr-smartwatch/1.0/ or is this a limited version of the full dataset used in the paper?
Difference/Inaccuracy in the HR from the ground truth ECG is one thing but missing almost 50% of that data is something that puzzles me. If so, is not the nearly 50% missing data a bigger problem than differences in HR from the round-truth ECG?
Regards
Devender
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: