Create LSP ML post and bLIP

[tnull]

Once we all agree on the general protocol structure and standardization process (e.g., after merging LSPS0), we should write-up a concise description and post to the mailing list to update the wider Lightning community on the progress. Moreover, we should then open a bLIP PR to have the message type and feature bit registered.

[ZmnSCPxj-jr]

LSPS0 merged, anyone willing to do this?

[aljazceru]

are we in a huge rush? i'd say seeing some of this adopted in production would be a good milestone, LSPS1 was finalized once before:)

[ZmnSCPxj-jr]

@niftynei wrote on the Lightning-dev mailing list: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2023-April/003915.html , I think it is appropriate to bring this up to a larger discussion group rather than present it as a fiat accompli.

True, this project is on a public github repo, but is it public enough?

[SeverinAlexB]

I think it might be a good idea to write a "Call for review" for LSPS1 & LSPS2 on the mailing list. These specs, even though not 100% finished yet, are pretty mature and it would be a good idea to ask for more reviews. What do you guys think?

[ZmnSCPxj-jr]

Anyone willing to volunteer for this?

[SeverinAlexB]

https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2023-May/003926.html

[ZmnSCPxj-jr]

So do we close this now?

[tnull]

So do we close this now?

I don't think so? When we land a bit more we still should write-up a bLIP to have the LSPS type registered.

[ZmnSCPxj-jr]

Should we start a bLIP now?

[tnull]

Should we start a bLIP now?

IIRC, last time this was discussed in the call the conclusion was that we'd wait until we have first interop between two clients, and that I should then draft a bLIP. Happy to revisit that though if we think this should happen sooner rather than later?

[tnull]

Since we now had the first interop on mainnet I think it might be time to pick this up. Will see to write a bLIP draft soon.