You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For BUIP81 we see that 13 members have voted and the voting system shows this as a quorum of 25% of the members.
In addition the vote is accepted with a 51% majority.
But for Article changes the following applies:
This document can be modified via a greater than 66%
majority vote on a BUIP with at least 75% of the
members voting.
The voting system should be able to distinguish between these different types of BUIPs and calculate the quorum and acceptance accordingly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, agreed, I need to implement voting for article change BUIPs. Of course, 'the code is not the law' here (c.f. Bitcoin Core) and the articles apply and not my bogus calculation :)
Thanks for reporting!
Given that we also have out of band voting still (on bitco.in), I likely need to add a comment that can be set by the vote master to indicate an override of the vote due to facts outside of the system. Long term, of course, I like this system to become definitive, because otherwise it is pointless.
For BUIP81 we see that 13 members have voted and the voting system shows this as a quorum of 25% of the members.
In addition the vote is accepted with a 51% majority.
But for Article changes the following applies:
The voting system should be able to distinguish between these different types of BUIPs and calculate the quorum and acceptance accordingly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: