You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In requirements.txt there is currently fonttools==4.34.4 pinned, but I'm working on packaging this in nixpkgs and we have fonttools 4.38.0 there. When I run the tests, two sample images are failing because their outputs look different on the cairo and skia backends: transformed_sweep and composite_colr_glyph.
Expected:
Actual:
Expected:
Actual:
I confirmed that switching back to fonttools 4.34.4 fixes the test failures so it seems to be due to some change in fonttools.
You might know about this already, I guess it's (one of the) issues afflicting PR #146, if so I apologise for the extra noise.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the report! Yes, this is unfortunately a known issue, and no worries about the noise. If you'd see a quick way to fix this: I'm open to a PR.
In
requirements.txt
there is currentlyfonttools==4.34.4
pinned, but I'm working on packaging this in nixpkgs and we have fonttools 4.38.0 there. When I run the tests, two sample images are failing because their outputs look different on the cairo and skia backends:transformed_sweep
andcomposite_colr_glyph
.Expected:
![glyph_more_samples_transformed_sweep_cairo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/398575/235655189-782b413e-c287-4bed-884a-dbbcd5c79759.png)
Actual:
![glyph_more_samples_transformed_sweep_cairo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/398575/235655250-7d704405-9cf9-44a1-b920-7bbfe4d4beca.png)
Expected:
![glyph_more_samples_composite_colr_glyph_cairo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/398575/235655320-121a3c74-4edc-4e71-ba52-9f4b242bea85.png)
Actual:
![glyph_more_samples_composite_colr_glyph_cairo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/398575/235655346-fa3c70aa-8be5-4535-9b96-226802211ff0.png)
I confirmed that switching back to fonttools 4.34.4 fixes the test failures so it seems to be due to some change in fonttools.
You might know about this already, I guess it's (one of the) issues afflicting PR #146, if so I apologise for the extra noise.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: