You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In sediment.F90 (p4zsed.F90 in PISCES r4.0-HEAD.r13720), calcite dissolution in sediment depends on the calcite saturation state of the overlying water (Eq 91 in paper):
Does zfactcal represent the preserved fraction, as hinted at by the paper and matching the fact that it increases with increasing saturation [= decreasing zfactcal]? Or does it represent the dissolved fraction, as it is treated in the original PISCES code? In the latter case, however, excess takes negative values when the water is supersaturated. This leads to zfactcal being positive and dissolution occurring. Is that intentional? It leads to further oversaturation and even faster dissolution - a positive feedback.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In
sediment.F90
(p4zsed.F90
in PISCES r4.0-HEAD.r13720), calcite dissolution in sediment depends on the calcite saturation state of the overlying water (Eq 91 in paper):fabm-pisces/src/sediment.F90
Lines 113 to 114 in 4fa3027
Does
zfactcal
represent the preserved fraction, as hinted at by the paper and matching the fact that it increases with increasing saturation [= decreasingzfactcal
]? Or does it represent the dissolved fraction, as it is treated in the original PISCES code? In the latter case, however, excess takes negative values when the water is supersaturated. This leads tozfactcal
being positive and dissolution occurring. Is that intentional? It leads to further oversaturation and even faster dissolution - a positive feedback.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: