This document describes how the TealTiger project is governed, how decisions are made, and how contributors can grow into leadership roles.
- Meritocracy — Roles are earned through consistent, quality contributions
- Transparency — Decisions are made in public (issues, PRs, Discord)
- Inclusivity — Everyone is welcome to contribute regardless of experience level
- Trust is earned gradually — Permissions expand as trust is demonstrated over time
How to become one: Submit 1 merged PR.
Permissions:
- Submit pull requests
- Comment on issues and PRs
- Participate in Discussions
Expectations:
- Follow the Contributing Guide
- Be respectful and constructive
- Respond to review feedback
How to become one: 5+ quality PRs merged over 2+ weeks of consistent activity.
Permissions:
- Self-assign up to 3 open issues at a time
- Leave review comments on PRs (advisory, non-binding)
- Help triage issues (suggest labels, ask for details, identify duplicates)
- Mentioned in CONTRIBUTORS.md with a special badge
Expectations:
- Leave room for new contributors on good-first-issues
- Help newcomers with their first PRs
- Follow project conventions without being reminded
How to become one: 10+ quality PRs + demonstrated good judgment in reviews + 1 month of consistent activity.
Permissions:
- Approve and merge documentation/example PRs without owner sign-off
- Request changes on code PRs (owner still merges code)
- Triage and label issues
- Close duplicate issues
- Listed in CODEOWNERS for their area of expertise
Expectations:
- Review PRs within 2-3 business days
- Provide constructive, specific feedback
- Ensure PRs include documentation (our "docs at merge time" rule)
- Flag security concerns to the owner
How to become one: Reviewer for 1+ month + deep understanding of SDK architecture + demonstrated trust.
Permissions:
- Merge any PR (including core code changes)
- Cut patch releases
- Manage CI/CD configuration
- Triage security reports
- Participate in roadmap discussions
Expectations:
- Maintain code quality standards
- Ensure backward compatibility
- Coordinate with the owner on breaking changes
- Mentor reviewers and contributors
Who: @nagasatish007 (Naga Satish)
Responsibilities:
- Final authority on architecture decisions
- Roadmap and release planning
- Security incident response
- Community health and Code of Conduct enforcement
- Veto power on any merge (used sparingly)
| Decision Type | Who Decides |
|---|---|
| Merge docs/examples PR | Reviewer or above |
| Merge code PR | Co-Maintainer or Owner |
| Architecture changes | Owner (with community input) |
| New feature direction | Owner (with community input) |
| Release timing | Co-Maintainer or Owner |
| Code of Conduct enforcement | Owner |
| Promotion decisions | Owner |
- Check before you start — Look at the "Development" section of an issue to see if a PR already exists
- Claim before you code — Comment "I'll take this" and wait for assignment before starting work
- One at a time for good-first-issues — Leave these for new contributors. If unclaimed after 7 days, anyone can take them
- 3 issue limit — Don't self-assign more than 3 open issues simultaneously
- All PRs require at least 1 review before merge
- Documentation/example PRs: Reviewer can approve and merge
- Code PRs: Owner or Co-Maintainer must approve
- Security-sensitive PRs: Owner must approve
- PRs must include documentation (code without docs is not shippable)
Promotions are not automatic. The owner evaluates candidates based on:
- Consistency — Active over weeks, not just a single burst
- Quality — PRs are clean, tested, and well-documented
- Judgment — Reviews show good technical taste
- Community — Helps others, doesn't monopolize issues
- Communication — Responsive, clear, constructive
To request consideration for promotion, reach out on Discord or open a Discussion.
| Role | People |
|---|---|
| Owner | @nagasatish007 |
| Co-Maintainer | — |
| Reviewer | — |
| Trusted Contributor | — |
| Contributor | @mvanhorn, @tmchow, @pntech20, @lleonardo-franco, @resolvicomai, @dagangtj, @aprv10, @MD-Mushfiqur123 |
This governance model may evolve as the project grows. Changes are proposed via PR and require owner approval.