Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add :child_order to .rebuild! #377

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

krtschmr
Copy link

#376

in order to respect a certain children order when calling rebuild! the children will be reordered with whatever the argument of child_order was

in order to respect a certain children order when calling rebuild! the children will be reordered with whatever the argument of `child_order` was
Metal.create(value: "name1")
Metal.create(value: "name2")
expect(parent.children).to receive(:reorder).with({value: :desc}).once.and_call_original
parent.rebuild!(child_order: {value: :desc})
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we should assert that the order is correct.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

great idea. i asserted that on our project but that's of course not sufficient. can you please help me how i could do it? The Metal model doesn't seem to have a sort_order, how would you write a spec for this?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

expect(parent.children[0].value).to_equal 'name1'
expect(parent.children[1].value).to_equal 'name2'
expect(parent.children[2].value).to_equal 'name3'

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

expect(parent.children[0].value).to_equal 'name1'
expect(parent.children[1].value).to_equal 'name2'
expect(parent.children[2].value).to_equal 'name3'

okay, if that would be sufficient, lemme add that quick. thanks.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@seuros is it possible that my fix isn't really a fix for the scope of the gem? it did work on our project, but i can't get it running for the specs on the gem.

i did create a new model which should the the numeric ordering.

class MetalWithNumericOrder < ActiveRecord::Base
  self.table_name = "#{table_name_prefix}metal#{table_name_suffix}"
  has_closure_tree order: 'sort_order', name_column: 'value', numeric_order: true
  self.inheritance_column = 'metal_type'
end
parent = MetalWithNumericOrder.create(value: "Parent")
      MetalWithNumericOrder.create(value: "3", parent: parent)
      MetalWithNumericOrder.create(value: "1", parent: parent)
      MetalWithNumericOrder.create(value: "2", parent: parent)
parent.rebuild!

i create a tree and now the order is 3, 1, 2 which is correct.

i would like to recreate the tree, but sort based on value, so i would expect then descendants to be 1,2,3

however i seem to be missing some logic here.

i had the impression that children.reorder(child_order).find_each { |c| c.rebuild!(true, child_order: child_order) } would be sufficient since that decides how we reorder the tree but it seems to be done in reorder_with_parent_id. do i need to inject the reordering in there?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you have act as list in the app ?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@seuros yes, acts_as_list is within it. does it interfere?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry @krtschmr , i missed this PR.

As you noticed reorder is part of Act as list and this gem . We could add a file that is required manually to add this feature. But it should not be part of the core maintenance file.

@seuros seuros self-assigned this Sep 17, 2021
@krtschmr
Copy link
Author

shall we close this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants