join default_tree_scope only when a limit_depth is given #440
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Although the query issued by the closure_tree_class.has_tree call has an optional argument
limit_depth
to reduce the load, the cost remains excessively high when dealing with the hierarchy table containing huge amount of records. Below is the execution plan of the query.The default_tree_scope is only meaningful when limit_depth is specified (though it's questionable whether it actually reduces the load). I have confirmed that even without the join, the load is not significantly higher.