Skip to content

Conversation

@GuillaumeLagrange
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@GuillaumeLagrange GuillaumeLagrange marked this pull request as ready for review November 4, 2025 13:11
@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Nov 4, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #145 will degrade performances by 32.72%

Comparing fix/ci-yaml (1bd1b2e) with main (e5597da)1

Summary

⚡ 23 improvements
❌ 41 regressions
✅ 299 untouched
🆕 22 new

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Change
WallTime build_vec 226 ns 215 ns +5.12%
Simulation Iterative 161.7 ns 132.5 ns +22.01%
WallTime Recursive 52.5 µs 46 µs +14.16%
Simulation Iterative[20] 161.7 ns 132.5 ns +22.01%
Simulation Iterative[21] 163.3 ns 134.2 ns +21.74%
WallTime Recursive[20] 52.6 µs 45.8 µs +14.86%
WallTime Recursive[21] 85.2 µs 73.8 µs +15.47%
WallTime fibonacci_custom_measurement 370 ns 423 ns -12.53%
WallTime large_drop 825.6 µs 783.9 µs +5.32%
WallTime small_drop 46 ns 51 ns -9.8%
WallTime large_setup 19 ns 24 ns -20.83%
WallTime iter_batched_ref_large_input 36 ns 40 ns -10%
WallTime from_elem[1024] 80 ns 83 ns -3.61%
WallTime from_elem[2048] 238 ns 253 ns -5.93%
WallTime from_elem[8192] 549 ns 568 ns -3.35%
WallTime from_elem_decimal[1024] 80 ns 84 ns -4.76%
WallTime from_elem_decimal[2048] 251 ns 264 ns -4.92%
WallTime bench_array1[4] 3 ns 4 ns -25%
WallTime bench_array2[4] 3 ns 4 ns -25%
WallTime init_array[4] 3 ns 4 ns -25%
... ... ... ... ... ...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on main (1531eea) during the generation of this report, so e5597da was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

@GuillaumeLagrange GuillaumeLagrange merged commit 1bd1b2e into main Nov 4, 2025
114 of 121 checks passed
@GuillaumeLagrange GuillaumeLagrange deleted the fix/ci-yaml branch November 4, 2025 14:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants