Update docs to 1.0 format

[ethanfrey]

Both SEMANTICS.md and IBC.md are outdated (using 0.14 style).

@hashedone raised this point

[hashedone]

Also make sure we have things documented in code - there are missing docs for example https://docs.rs/cosmwasm-std/0.16.0-rc5/cosmwasm_std/struct.Response.html has undocumented fields, or https://docs.rs/cosmwasm-std/0.16.0-rc5/cosmwasm_std/struct.HumanAddr.html has deprecation note, without info what to use instead.

[ethanfrey]

I just went to use SEMANTICS.md as a reference and the mix of messages/submessages is a bit disconcerting

[uint]

I just went to use SEMANTICS.md as a reference and the mix of messages/submessages is a bit disconcerting

I keep wondering if it's too confusing as well.

[ethanfrey]

It is supposed to be a complete documentation of the system. It is a useful spec for writing wasmd and multi-test and reasoning about this.

That said, we definitely need to update it. And if we can simplify it without removing information, I am happy for that

[barriebyron]

@ethanfrey can you make a codefest label and apply it here? See https://blog.cosmos.network/october-codefest-call-for-contributors-42ade37f4913 and https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lraKhXQNijWUscxV7yxl77tctYiPD5lV-78ryvGEKZs/edit

[ethanfrey]

Not sure if it makes sense for codefest.

Someone must understand both the 0.14 and the 1.0 APIs.
It is about changing code blocks not just text.

[ethanfrey]

Honestly, I don't think there is much in cosmwasm that is ready for beginners to contribute. Thus, we have no made the codefest label

[barriebyron]

thanks @ethanfrey for the comment and attention!

[chipshort]

Closing this, as #1963 covers updating SEMANTICS.md and we ultimately want to move this information into the new documentation page.