-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fuzz testing capabilities #24
Comments
I would love to see this, but it is not a simple thing to do. For sure, I would consider it, but I think that that kind of thing deserves a well-thought design to provide actual safety measurements, not just a good mood of the dev, so that his contracts pass regression. Long story short - yes, I would consider that. No, I will not expect it soon. |
That is what I thought! still, wanted to at least share the idea. Thanks for your efforts ser!! |
To be considered to implement in version 2.0.0 |
According What do we do for CosmWasm in 2025, there is no plan to implement this in Q1 2025. Closing this issue 😥 as |
Integrating fuzz testing as part of a testing suite will allow devs to catch edge cases easily, by improving traditional unit-testing or integration testing. Something along the lines of how Foundry does it for Solidity contracts https://book.getfoundry.sh/forge/fuzz-testing
From a security point of view it will be a very helpful tool. Would you consider this feature for a future release?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: