Skip to content

Ontology: Using Policy for PolicyDocument #317

Description

@lebogg

In #309 we introduced policies as sub classes of Policy. But Policy was originally meant to be something like Azure Policies I think.
Is it still the right place? @anatheka and me think functionality may be more appropriate. For me it is not a "functionality" but it is no security feature either. So functionality it is the best fit if we don't want it to be a policy like now

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Fields

No fields configured for issues without a type.

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions