You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
So far the only 2 key/value pairs available for the B1+ maps in the fmap folder are _acq-<acq-label> and _run-<run_index>. This does not seem sufficient for the characterization of the B1+/- maps for the hMRI toolboxexample dataset.
Using these example data,
B1+ maps are acquired for a series of 11 flip angles and 2 acquisition types (SE/STE). It would therefore be useful to use indexable metadata _fa-<index>.
B1- maps are acquired separately for the 3 anatomical images types (MTw, PDw and T1w) and the 2 coils (head and body), i.e. 3x2 images, each corresponding to a different acquisition type. Both information must appear in the filename otherwise 2 or 3 files would end up with the filename. Could the _mod-<mod-label> key/value pair be used for the 3 image types (MTw, PDw and T1w)?
Potential issues though:
Currently the _mod-<mod-label> key/value pair is only used for the case of a _defacemask.nii mask image, in order to associate this mask with the corresponding modality image, see here.
Plus, with MPM data, the suffix of the anatomical images is actually _MPM, and the image type defined in the _acq-<acq-label> key/value pair! So the _mod-<mod-label> may not be ideal...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
So far the only 2 key/value pairs available for the B1+ maps in the
fmap
folder are_acq-<acq-label>
and_run-<run_index>
. This does not seem sufficient for the characterization of the B1+/- maps for the hMRI toolbox example dataset.Using these example data,
_fa-<index>
._mod-<mod-label>
key/value pair be used for the 3 image types (MTw, PDw and T1w)?Potential issues though:
Currently the
_mod-<mod-label>
key/value pair is only used for the case of a_defacemask.nii
mask image, in order to associate this mask with the corresponding modality image, see here.Plus, with MPM data, the suffix of the anatomical images is actually
_MPM
, and the image type defined in the_acq-<acq-label>
key/value pair! So the_mod-<mod-label>
may not be ideal...The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: