Problem or Use Case
It would be interesting to decouple the FXServer installation path (artifacts) from the actual server data (data).
Currently, updating FXServer requires managing the artifacts within the same directory context or duplicating setups. Allowing a strict separation would enable developpers to maintain a single, centralized location for FXServer updates while having multiple server-data directories elsewhere.
Proposed Solution
Implement in the dxm new command something like : dxm new --only-data <path>
Alternative Solutions
No response
Additional Context
No response
Problem or Use Case
It would be interesting to decouple the FXServer installation path (artifacts) from the actual server data (data).
Currently, updating FXServer requires managing the artifacts within the same directory context or duplicating setups. Allowing a strict separation would enable developpers to maintain a single, centralized location for FXServer updates while having multiple server-data directories elsewhere.
Proposed Solution
Implement in the dxm new command something like :
dxm new --only-data <path>Alternative Solutions
No response
Additional Context
No response