Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The properties and types reconciliation for MusicBrainz should undergo a comprehensive re-examination. #184

Closed
candlecao opened this issue Sep 16, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@candlecao
Copy link
Contributor

candlecao commented Sep 16, 2024

Since we have expanded the scale of the MusicBrainz dataset, more entities and properties have been included. Both these additional entities and properties, as well as the previously existing ones, need to be thoroughly examined.

@candlecao candlecao self-assigned this Sep 16, 2024
@candlecao candlecao changed the title The properties and types reconciliation for MusicBrainz should be examined again. The properties and types reconciliation for MusicBrainz should undergo a comprehensive re-examination. Sep 16, 2024
@candlecao
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am accounting for the properties mapping in the file named AccountForReconciliation.ttl
https://github.com/DDMAL/linkedmusic-datalake/blob/main/csv2rdf/MusicBrainz/AccountForReconciliation.ttl
For those uncertain, I mark [uncertain].

@candlecao
Copy link
Contributor Author

Why there is no relations_wiki property in recording.csv? @Yueqiao12Zhang

@candlecao
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant