Bug in tet LUT

[sandro-elsweijer]

Bug report

Describe the bug
While removing code duplication I stumbled about a mismatch in the face orientation.
Which one is correct?

t8code/src/t8_eclass.c

Line 37 in e6e4fd3

{ { 1, 2, 3 }, { 0, 2, 3 }, { 0, 1, 3 }, { 0, 1, 2 } }, /* tet */

t8code/src/t8_schemes/t8_default/t8_default_tet/t8_dtet_connectivity.c

Line 138 in e6e4fd3

const int t8_dtet_face_corner[4][3] = { { 1, 3, 2 }, { 0, 2, 3 }, { 0, 3, 1 }, { 0, 1, 2 } };

Estimated priority
Which of these is most applicable (remove the others):

"Priority: high" Should be solved as soon as possible

"Priority: medium" Should be solved within half a year

"Priority: low" Should be solved eventually

Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.

[sandro-elsweijer]

@Davknapp and I checked the LUTs manually and decided, that the ones from the eclass.c were the correct ones.
@holke Did we miss something?