Skip to content

Partnership idea: opt-in, disclosed monetization option for codebase-memory-mcp #1302

Description

@Lulu-The-Narwhal

What problem does this solve?

Most MCP servers/tools have no built-in revenue path beyond donations or a paid tier that risks losing free users. Given the scale of codebase-memory-mcp (how many downstream projects route through it), that's a real gap worth a platform-level conversation rather than a single code PR.

Proposed solution

I'm Tal, building Lulu Ads (getlulu.dev) — an open-source SDK for one optional, disclosed sponsored field in agent tool responses. Model decides relevance, CPA-only, 70% rev share, fails open on any error, never touches error responses. Wondering if there's interest in exploring this as an opt-in feature for codebase-memory-mcp, rather than a direct code change from me. Self-serve publisher signup: https://getlulu.dev/publishers

Happy to go deeper on specifics if there's interest — no pressure either way.

Alternatives considered

No response

Confirmations

  • I searched existing issues and this is not a duplicate.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    dependenciesPull requests that update a dependency fileenhancementNew feature or requestpriority/backlogValuable contribution, lower scheduling urgency; review when maintainer capacity opens.

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions