-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GSL-style groups #200
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
Comments
Hi @Savvassidi! I didn't know that format. However, it seems like it has nothing to do with double elimination, and is actually replacing round-robin groups 🤔 It looks like it's often called GSL-style groups, so I'll rename the issue if it's indeed what you're talking about 😉 I may consider adding it if it's not too difficult to implement. I'll explore that later. |
It utilities double elimination actually; base difference is that there's
no final match, there are loser brackets as double elimination. You maybe
correct though, will leave you are it. Thank you
…On Tue, Mar 5, 2024, 10:57 AM Corentin Girard ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi @Savvassidi <https://github.com/Savvassidi>! I didn't know that
format. However, it seems like it has nothing to do with double
elimination, and is actually replacing round-robin groups.
It looks like it's often called GSL-style groups, so I'll rename the issue
if it's indeed what you're talking about 😉
I may consider adding it if it's not too difficult to implement. I'll
explore that later.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#200 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANQBC7KPGL3MM3GPRJGSDRDYWWCIFAVCNFSM6AAAAABEGWHG4WVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNZYGI2TKMJTGI>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hello. Could you consider adding this tournament format to the existing ones? It's a really common format in eSports, mainly differing on the last part of usual double elimination.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: