You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I couldn't think of a better place to ask this Q, so I decided to ask here
When using FastImage.preload(...), is it significantly better to preload N images at once (passing an array of N sources), or to call FastImage.preload(...)N times with a single source each time? We could suppose that the time difference between subsequent calls in the latter case is very small (almost negligible)
In case of a former, how big this N should be to feel a difference?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hi folks,
I couldn't think of a better place to ask this Q, so I decided to ask here
When using
FastImage.preload(...)
, is it significantly better to preload N images at once (passing an array of N sources), or to callFastImage.preload(...)
N times with a single source each time? We could suppose that the time difference between subsequent calls in the latter case is very small (almost negligible)In case of a former, how big this N should be to feel a difference?
Kind regards,
Władysław
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions