Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Respect replaceVanillaSapling configuration #650

Open
forresthopkinsa opened this issue Nov 25, 2020 · 5 comments
Open

Respect replaceVanillaSapling configuration #650

forresthopkinsa opened this issue Nov 25, 2020 · 5 comments
Labels
1.12.2 Related to the 1.12.2 version

Comments

@forresthopkinsa
Copy link

I've noticed that a couple addons (Natura, BoP) allow placing their mods' respective saplings instead of transforming them into dynamic saplings.

This is a serious game balance issue, because vanilla tree mechanics are much more generous than the superior DT mechanics.

Players on my server are planting trees from mods that allow vanilla growth so they can get more wood, faster. This is a downside both aesthetically and balance-wise.

I don't know if it's feasible to intercept the placement of saplings from these other mods, but it would be a huge boon.

I don't think it's relevant, but these are my versions:

  • Minecraft 1.12.2
  • Forge 14.23.5.2854
  • Dynamic Trees 0.9.21
  • Dynamic Trees Natura 1.1.6
  • Dynamic Trees BoP 1.4.4
  • Biomes o Plenty 7.0.1.2444
  • Natura 4.3.2.69
@Harleyoc1
Copy link
Member

As I mentioned in the Discord:

We will get around to them all just takes some time as you’d have to update each addon individually and weren’t sure if many people used the sapling replacements.

It’s not a bug, and nor was it intentional to omit them, just hasn’t been implemented yet.

@forresthopkinsa
Copy link
Author

Thanks!

@supermassimo supermassimo transferred this issue from DynamicTreesTeam/DynamicTrees-ExC Jan 16, 2022
@supermassimo supermassimo added 1.12.2 Related to the 1.12.2 version addon labels Jan 16, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has gone stale due to it having no activity for 90 days. Is this still a problem?

@forresthopkinsa
Copy link
Author

This feature request has not been implemented yet and should not be closed

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has gone stale due to it having no activity for 90 days. Is this still a problem?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1.12.2 Related to the 1.12.2 version
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants