You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dataframes would be a better container for the metadata about a piece and about a group of pieces. This data structure would facilitate the assignment of metadata (which is currently laboriously element-wise) and combining of metadata about individual indexed_pieces to the metadata about their containing aggregated_piece object. This is related to issue #408 and unfortunately won't get addressed in time for VIS 3.0. Since the metadata is currently stored in a dictonary, and you can build a dataframe from a dictionary easily, this shouldn't be too difficult.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dataframes would be a better container for the metadata about a piece and about a group of pieces. This data structure would facilitate the assignment of metadata (which is currently laboriously element-wise) and combining of metadata about individual indexed_pieces to the metadata about their containing aggregated_piece object. This is related to issue #408 and unfortunately won't get addressed in time for VIS 3.0. Since the metadata is currently stored in a dictonary, and you can build a dataframe from a dictionary easily, this shouldn't be too difficult.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: