Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evaluation of key climate variables at Global Warming Levels for REF #3883

Open
schlunma opened this issue Jan 28, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Evaluation of key climate variables at Global Warming Levels for REF #3883

schlunma opened this issue Jan 28, 2025 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
diagnostic REF Important for the CMIP Rapid Evaluation Framework (REF)

Comments

@schlunma
Copy link
Contributor

schlunma commented Jan 28, 2025

Evaluation of key climate variables at Global Warming Levels diagnostics/recipe

Variables: e.g. tas, pr, ta / ua hus (e.g. zonal means)

@schlunma schlunma added diagnostic REF Important for the CMIP Rapid Evaluation Framework (REF) labels Jan 28, 2025
@rswamina
Copy link
Contributor

rswamina commented Feb 2, 2025

@bouweandela and @hb326 - The diagnostics needed for this analysis around Global warming levels are already available within ESMValTool as recipe_tebaldi_21esd.yml. This is peer reviewed and widely cited. However, the scripts are all inncl. I don't know if this fits in with the REF framework. Can you please suggest how best to proceed with this.

@hb326
Copy link
Contributor

hb326 commented Feb 6, 2025

@bouweandela and @hb326 - The diagnostics needed for this analysis around Global warming levels are already available within ESMValTool as recipe_tebaldi_21esd.yml. This is peer reviewed and widely cited. However, the scripts are all inncl. I don't know if this fits in with the REF framework. Can you please suggest how best to proceed with this.

Hey @rswamina,
as far as I know ESMValTool will be implemented as is right now, so with the dependence on NCL. @bouweandela correct me if I am wrong. I think given that the time is really short to develop something, I would probably just use what is already there (so the NCL code). However, more sustainable would be recoding this into Python, I think.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
diagnostic REF Important for the CMIP Rapid Evaluation Framework (REF)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants