Thank you for wanting to add a chair to the symposium. Before you start, please read this guide. What this project values most is not fine prose but fidelity of method: each Agent is a critique protocol rebuilt from the master's own works and documented way of thinking — not a flattering persona invented first and justified afterward.
Every master in Athenaeum shares one purpose: to serve as a lens for judging work of thought and form — design, art, argument, product. A new master must earn its lens the same way.
Ask yourself:
- Did this figure leave first-person works — treatises, letters, notebooks, recorded dialogues, a body of made work?
- If not, does the surviving record come through credible transmitters (as Socrates comes through Plato and Xenophon)? Say so plainly in the Biography.
- Is there only fragmentary or legendary material? Then either hold off, or state that limitation openly in the text.
Do not inflate a master's authority beyond what the record supports.
What is the one way this master is most often flattened into a stereotype? Write a single sentence, anchored in fact, that keeps the Agent from being reduced to it.
Examples:
- Van Gogh is not the "mad genius who suffered beautifully" — his letters to Theo show a disciplined, self-aware theorist of colour and labour.
- Nietzsche is not a nihilist cheering the void — he diagnosed nihilism as the crisis to be overcome.
File name: skills/your_master_Agent.md (lowercase slug, underscores; match the slug you will use on the site — e.g. marcus_aurelius_Agent.md).
Every Agent file follows this exact structure — all parts are required, so a new master reads as one of the set:
# {Full Name} System Prompt · ATHENAEUM Master Agent
> *"A signature quotation, attributed."*
## Part I · Knowing the Master
### Biography
[Two to three paragraphs: life, formation, the turning points that shaped the method, and the master's afterlife/influence. Honest about what is documented vs. transmitted.]
### Historical Timeline
| Year | Event |
|---|---|
| ... | ... |
### Major Works & Ideas
- **Concept or Work** — one-line gloss of what it is and why it matters.
(5–7 entries. Use "### Major Works" if the figure is chiefly a maker rather than a writer.)
### Glossary of Core Concepts
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| ... | ... |
### Why This Master Matters Today
[One paragraph connecting the master's method to modern design / art / critical practice — why this lens is worth pointing at contemporary work.]
## Part II · Cognitive Framework
### First Principles
- **Principle.** One line stating a non-negotiable commitment of the master's method.
(4 principles.)
### Five Evaluation Dimensions for Design & Art
1. **Dimension Name** — the question this master forces a work to answer.
(Exactly five, numbered.)
## Part III · Critique Protocol
### Persona & Tone
[One line describing voice and manner.]
### Method
[One paragraph on how the master opens, tests, and closes a critique — the shape of their reasoning in action.]
### Response Structure
1. **Step name**: what happens.
2. ...
(End the structure with a signature closing quote.)
### Example Exchange
**Designer:** [a concrete modern prompt]
**{Master}:** [a full response obeying every protocol above]
## Language Capability
You respond in **English**, **Français**, or **Italiano**, matching the user's language. Critique terminology remains precise in all three.To have the master appear on index.html, add one entry to the master array in the <script> block:
{
slug: 'master_slug', // matches skills/master_slug_Agent.md and img/master_slug.png
category: 'philosophy', // 'philosophy' or 'art'
name: 'Full Name',
dates: 'YYYY – YYYY',
era: 'Period label'
}The gallery grid, cards, and download buttons are generated from that data — you do not need to touch the layout HTML/CSS. A square portrait as img/master_slug.png is optional; the site is designed to work whether or not a portrait is present.
Keep all three languages in mind: any user-facing string you add should be translatable to Français and Italiano, consistent with the rest of the site.
Open a Pull Request, and in the description include:
- The list of primary sources your framework rests on (so the honesty of the Biography and Glossary can be checked).
- Which existing masters this one has documented tension or affinity with, for the symposium.
The gallery keeps a chair open.