[NOQA] fix: performance analytics markers

[adhorodyski]

@kirillzyusko @mountiny @hannojg

Explanation of Change

This PR corrects performance markers (both local & reporting to Firebase) in their docs as well as the implementation. Goal is to have clear definitions and be able to correctly collect performance data from full user interactions.

Fixed Issues

$ #51742
PROPOSAL: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C05LX9D6E07/p1730214849510819

Tests

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

• I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
  • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
  • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
  • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
  • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
• I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop
• I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
• I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
  • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
  • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
  • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
  • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
  • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
• If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
• I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
• I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
• I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
• If any new file was added I verified that:
  • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
• If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • A similar style doesn't already exist
  • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
• If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
• If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
• If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
  • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
  • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
• If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
• If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Android: mWeb Chrome

iOS: Native

iOS: mWeb Safari

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

MacOS: Desktop

[melvin-bot]

@hoangzinh Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

[hoangzinh]

Hey @mountiny do we need a C+ for this PR?

[mountiny]

LGTM but waiting to confirm the e2e tests will work fine with all these changes

[mountiny]

Reviewer Checklist

• I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
• I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
  • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
  • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
  • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
• I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
• I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop
• If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
• I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
  • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
  • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
  • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
  • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
  • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
• If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
• I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
• I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
• If a new component is created I verified that:
  • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
  • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
  • The file is named correctly
  • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
  • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
  • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
  • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
  • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
  • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
• If any new file was added I verified that:
  • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
• If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • A similar style doesn't already exist
  • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
• If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
• If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
• If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
  • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
  • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
• If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
• If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
• I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Android: mWeb Chrome

iOS: Native

iOS: mWeb Safari

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

MacOS: Desktop

[blazejkustra]

LGTM

[kirillzyusko]

I could run e2e tests successfully (in dev mode - that's why baseline and delta results are identical). Below are results:

Name	Duration
App start time nativeLaunchEnd_To_appCreationStart	213.188 ms → 213.188 ms
App start time nativeLaunch	636.375 ms → 636.375 ms
App start time appCreationEnd_To_contentAppeared	4319.933 ms → 4319.933 ms
App start time contentAppeared_To_screenTTI	2535.162 ms → 2535.162 ms
App start time appCreation	340.938 ms → 340.938 ms
App start time jsBundleDownload	1256.313 ms → 1256.313 ms
App start time TTI	8016.331 ms → 8016.331 ms
App start time regularAppStart	0.340 ms → 0.340 ms
App start time runJsBundle	2434.733 ms → 2434.733 ms
App start time (CPU)	122.729 % → 122.729 %
App start time (FPS)	50.301 FPS → 50.301 FPS
App start time (RAM)	535.726 MB → 535.726 MB
App start time (CPU/JS)	58.700 % → 58.700 %
App start time (CPU/UI)	22.307 % → 22.307 %
Open search router TTI Load Search Options	103.367 ms → 103.367 ms
Open search router TTI Open Search Router TTI	640.332 ms → 640.332 ms
Open search router TTI (CPU)	121.977 % → 121.977 %
Open search router TTI (FPS)	50.437 FPS → 50.437 FPS
Open search router TTI (RAM)	539.509 MB → 539.509 MB
Open search router TTI (CPU/JS)	57.487 % → 57.487 %
Open search router TTI (CPU/UI)	23.920 % → 23.920 %
Report typing Composer typing rerender count	1.000 renders → 1.000 renders
Report typing Message sent	588.871 ms → 588.871 ms
Report typing (CPU)	131.267 % → 131.267 %
Report typing (FPS)	52.008 FPS → 52.008 FPS
Report typing (RAM)	627.457 MB → 627.457 MB
Report typing (CPU/JS)	54.462 % → 54.462 %
Report typing (CPU/UI)	24.194 % → 24.194 %
Chat opening Chat TTI	793.207 ms → 793.207 ms
Chat opening (CPU)	123.160 % → 123.160 %
Chat opening (FPS)	50.667 FPS → 50.667 FPS
Chat opening (RAM)	553.404 MB → 553.404 MB
Chat opening (CPU/JS)	60.288 % → 60.288 %
Chat opening (CPU/UI)	22.733 % → 22.733 %
Linking	1452.700 ms → 1452.700 ms
Linking (CPU)	128.259 % → 128.259 %
Linking (FPS)	51.749 FPS → 51.749 FPS
Linking (RAM)	595.603 MB → 595.603 MB
Linking (CPU/JS)	65.580 % → 65.580 %
Linking (CPU/UI)	22.667 % → 22.667 %

[kirillzyusko]

@hannojg can you also review these changes? 👀

[adhorodyski]

@mountiny should we worry about these eslint checks here? This is an error on withOnyx deprecation.

/home/runner/work/App/App/src/pages/home/sidebar/SidebarLinksData.tsx
  77:16  error  'withOnyx' is deprecated. Use `useOnyx` instead of `withOnyx` whenever possible.

[adhorodyski]

I think I missed the updated sidebar_loaded end event, updating this shortly before we merge anything.

[adhorodyski]

Updated with the new sidebar_loaded end event placement, here's a before/after. @kirillzyusko could you please rerun the e2e suite on your end? It's a pretty crucial trigger so I don't want to mess it up 😅 Thanks!

Also, this one is not being reported to Firebase with this PR. Should we do it? It doesn't provide us with a full TTI measure (I will follow up with this one), but gives a sense of how long the LHN itself takes to load for people.

tti.after.mov

[hannojg]

Yes, if the e2e tests are still working this LGTM!

[mountiny]

@adhorodyski no need to worry about the eslint

And we can add it, I dont think its any harm in adding these, worst case we decide later its not useful and we stop using it

[mountiny]

Thanks, seems like we are good to go, right?

[mountiny]

Not changing the useOnyx everywhere in this PR

[melvin-bot]

@mountiny looks like this was merged without a test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

[mountiny]

Explained above

[OSBotify]

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

[github-actions]

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.0.61-0 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄	success ✅
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄	success ✅

[github-actions]

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/francoisl in version: 9.0.61-3 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄	skipped 🚫
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄	skipped 🚫