Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jobs with few PS crash the scenarioTwinViewer1 scenario #1

Open
Fabulani opened this issue Jun 14, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Jobs with few PS crash the scenarioTwinViewer1 scenario #1

Fabulani opened this issue Jun 14, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Fabulani
Copy link
Owner

In the OP states of the scenarioTwinViewer1.py scenario, a constant is used to define which PS to begin. This causes a list out of index type of error when the Job that is being executed does not have the standard amount of PS.

A work-around would be avoiding the creation of Jobs without the default amount of PS.

A possible fix would be implementing state transitions according to the to-be-executed PS. The order of execution could be defined by the PS list itself, or by a tree-structure if parallel execution is desired. This can also lead to very confusing diagrams, as shown below.

opera_5O1Qpnp12U

@Fabulani Fabulani added bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request labels Jun 14, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant