You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Both ours and SyncTalk are good works, while these two aims to solve different problems. SyncTalk solves some "devil" problems and make validations on ER-NeRF. Our work focus on the modeling methodology itself and relatively less on the details, while in the implementation we also use some good design in SyncTalk to provide better performance, on the premise of fairness.
Both ours and SyncTalk are good works, while these two aims to solve different problems. SyncTalk solves some "devil" problems and make validations on ER-NeRF. Our work focus on the modeling methodology itself and relatively less on the details, while in the implementation we also use some good design in SyncTalk to provide better performance, on the premise of fairness.
Is this better than synctalk?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: