Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is this better than synctalk? #44

Open
linhcentrio opened this issue Sep 28, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Is this better than synctalk? #44

linhcentrio opened this issue Sep 28, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@linhcentrio
Copy link

Is this better than synctalk?

@Fictionarry
Copy link
Owner

Both ours and SyncTalk are good works, while these two aims to solve different problems. SyncTalk solves some "devil" problems and make validations on ER-NeRF. Our work focus on the modeling methodology itself and relatively less on the details, while in the implementation we also use some good design in SyncTalk to provide better performance, on the premise of fairness.

@linhcentrio
Copy link
Author

Both ours and SyncTalk are good works, while these two aims to solve different problems. SyncTalk solves some "devil" problems and make validations on ER-NeRF. Our work focus on the modeling methodology itself and relatively less on the details, while in the implementation we also use some good design in SyncTalk to provide better performance, on the premise of fairness.

thank you, it's good new. good job!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants