Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing fields in dsgoc2_delay #10

Open
NeariX67 opened this issue Mar 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Missing fields in dsgoc2_delay #10

NeariX67 opened this issue Mar 7, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@NeariX67
Copy link

NeariX67 commented Mar 7, 2024

Newer JBD versions (tested with firmware 0x28) appear to have more dsgoc2_delay values than documented. I have 2 BMS that have Byte 1 of 0x38 set to 0x90 and 0xC0, indicating that dsgoc2_delay has more values beyond 1280ms. The size (4 bits) for this confirms this suspicion, because only 8 of 16 values are documented.

However, 0xC0 would mean a value of 12 for dsgoc2_delay, which would be 40960ms. And it absolutely makes no sense to set a overcurrentprotection delay to almost 41 seconds, so I believe there is something different going on.

Affected code of JBD_REGISTER_MAP.md

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant