Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BUG: mutation nuc:C11956T cannot be displayed correctly if one choose "Show amino acid and nucleotide mutations together" #737

Open
AnonymousUserUse opened this issue Feb 23, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@AnonymousUserUse
Copy link

I do not know the exact problem behind this, so I just report the bug that I met:
When I e.g. search for the variant XBB.1.9* (https://cov-spectrum.org/explore/World/AllSamples/Past2M/variants?nextcladePangoLineage=XBB.1.9*&), which partly contains the mutation nuc:C11956T, I can see this mutation in the list of nucleotide mutations.
However, if I choose "Show amino acid and nucleotide mutations together", the mutation nuc:C11956T disappeared.

image
image

@chaoran-chen

@AnonymousUserUse
Copy link
Author

@chaoran-chen
Copy link
Member

Hi @AnonymousUserUse, thank you very much for reporting this, and sorry for the very late reply! The reason for it is that the 11956 position corresponds to ORF1a:3897 where we have the mutation ORF1a:D3897G with a very low prevalence of 0.04%. This is causing it not to appear by default but only if we change the proportion filter.

image

That's not very intuitive and we will try to make it better.

@AnonymousUserUse
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the explanation. @chaoran-chen
It seems that this problem occurs very frequently in large lineages.
I hope that nucleotide mutations corresponding to amino acid mutations that have a prevalence outside the selected range can also be shown in "additional nucleotide mutations" in the future.
Maybe this issue can be added to the to-do-list.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants