You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 18, 2024. It is now read-only.
If L1 and L2 utxos are distinguished by their network ID in address, then de-committing can just be a result of an L2 transaction that outputs a utxo with an L1 address.
Pros:
The same L2 tx can partially decommit some funds while keeping the rest on L2.
Cons:
More difficult to handle intermingled tx/decommit logic with minimal modification to Cardano ledger rules.
How:
Validate the tx while disabling any checks of network ID in output addresses.
If the tx validates, partition its outputs into those staying on L2 and those departing to L1.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
If L1 and L2 utxos are distinguished by their network ID in address, then de-committing can just be a result of an L2 transaction that outputs a utxo with an L1 address.
Pros:
Cons:
How:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: