You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is a tracking issue. We need to enhance the handling of sensitive fields for this resource. The GCP API field params is a map where the valid key names depend on the value of another field, dataSourceId, which specifies the type of transfer config. To address this, we likely need to introduce virtual KRM fields (strongly typed for each transfer configuration type) and implement proper handling for sensitive values within the map.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
jingyih
changed the title
Enhance sensitive field handling for Bigquerydatatransferconfig
Enhance sensitive field handling for BigQueryDataTransferConfig
Dec 4, 2024
I just realized I couldn’t find the beta promotion of BigQueryDataTransferConfig mentioned in any release notes. I believe it was promoted in version 1.125. Can we edit previously published release notes?
I just realized I couldn’t find the beta promotion of BigQueryDataTransferConfig mentioned in any release notes. I believe it was promoted in version 1.125. Can we edit previously published release notes?
Because we have a pending discussion on whether to special handle the sensitive fields. This could end up as API changes. Let's add the release note in 1.126 .
This is a tracking issue. We need to enhance the handling of sensitive fields for this resource. The GCP API field
params
is a map where the valid key names depend on the value of another field,dataSourceId
, which specifies the type of transfer config. To address this, we likely need to introduce virtual KRM fields (strongly typed for each transfer configuration type) and implement proper handling for sensitive values within the map.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: