Web-Based DNS Test vs Sniffnet #413
Closed
wakeUPslow
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
Hi @wakeUPslow First of all thanks for your interest in Sniffnet... I'm so happy you are finding it useful! I need some more info to better understand what's happening:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello people, Ill start by saying i stumbled into Sniffnet a few days ago after i somehow stumbled into 'Deb-Get'...I didn't know either existed. Really enjoy Sniffnet and plan on keeping it in my tool bag. Its very easy to use and navigate, i dont have to google how to edit config files and what not. From a beginner/novice computer person pov...great job to the person and or people that made/making this.
I use protonvpn 'paid' account which uses a dummy kill switch to block or route ipv6 traffic to a black hole (null route), as Proton doesn't support ipv6.
Sniffnet is showing traffic (not a lot but enough to cause some concern) on my ipv6leakintrf0 network-adapter which I believe means I'm leaking.
I checked https://browserleaks.com/ and https://www.dnsleaktest.com/, both of which don't show any dns leaks.
I don't have the best understanding of the nature and limitations of web-based tests or Sniffnet, but I'm wondering why the discrepancy between them and which one is right/wrong?
I apologize if this is wrong place to post, I do plan on going to home distro and protonsupport, i just wanted to touch base and see if i could get anyones thoughts while i was here checkin out the app's GitHub
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions