You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Decide if you want to use the tex_constants. If not, then just get rid of any \mapvar{RBC_latent_state} etc. in the document. I will remove the package and macro when I edit it next
Update all hardcoded numbers such as the number of samples, the pseudotrue, etc. based on the code in generate_results and the constants for running the scripts in this repo
Verify anything which refers to qualitative results in the tables/figures to doublecheck that they are still correct (e.g., that signs didn't flip, that quality is described accurately, etc.)
See if there are any changes in formatting or bugs in the figures or tables and post issues for me if something needs to be changed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When David was editing the numbers in the intro part I see that he has been using \mapvar{}. Hence I'm going to follow the same approach at this point.
I've updated all the constants -- the number of variables, observations, states, etc -- accordingly in the csv file. What I haven't updated in the main text are mostly constants that are used only once, or model specific ones, or the numbers existing in the tables. In addition, I edited some qualitative and quantitative descriptions in the paper.
Now I am pretty sure that there are no issues with the main texts. I passed the texts to David and asked him for another round of review, but my hunch is we are very close for the main texts.
\mapvar{RBC_latent_state}
etc. in the document. I will remove the package and macro when I edit it nextgenerate_results
and the constants for running the scripts in this repoThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: