Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Possibility to add Hosts/Services to Business Processes from monitoring/icingadb view #341

Open
mwaldmueller opened this issue Aug 3, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Possibility to add Hosts/Services to Business Processes from monitoring/icingadb view #341

mwaldmueller opened this issue Aug 3, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
@sukhwinder33445
Labels
enhancement New feature or improvement queue/wishlist Probable candidate for a future release

Comments

@mwaldmueller
Copy link

When clicking on "Business Impact" as Host- or Service-action in monitoring/icingadb detail view, there should be the option to add this Host/Service to an (existing) business process.

Environment

Business Process Module v2.4.0
Icinga Web 2.11.1
@mwaldmueller mwaldmueller changed the title Business Impact should allow Hosts/Services to add them to Business Processes Possibility to add Hosts/Services to Business Processes from monitoring/icingadb view Aug 3, 2022
@nilmerg nilmerg added the enhancement New feature or improvement label Jul 25, 2023
@nilmerg nilmerg added this to the 2.5.0 milestone Jul 25, 2023
@nilmerg nilmerg moved this from Todo to In Progress in Icinga Business Process Modeling v2.5.0 Jul 26, 2023
@nilmerg nilmerg removed this from the 2.5.0 milestone Aug 4, 2023
@nilmerg nilmerg added the queue/wishlist Probable candidate for a future release label Aug 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@sukhwinder33445 sukhwinder33445

Labels
enhancement New feature or improvement queue/wishlist Probable candidate for a future release
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@mwaldmueller @nilmerg @sukhwinder33445