Skip to content

[Search][Bounty] Add search result quality feedback loop to search_knowledge.py #604

Description

@Ikalus1988

Goal

Add a feedback mechanism to search_knowledge.py so users/agents can report whether search results were useful.

Deliverable

  • Add --feedback flag to search_knowledge.py
  • After displaying results, prompt: "Was this helpful? (y/n/comment)"
  • Log feedback to data/search-feedback.jsonl with: query, results shown, feedback, timestamp
  • No external dependencies

Acceptance Criteria

  • python3 search_knowledge.py "pip timeout" --feedback works
  • Feedback logged to data/search-feedback.jsonl
  • No PII in logs (only query + result IDs + feedback)
  • Existing search behavior unchanged when --feedback not used

Priority

This feeds into #574 (feedback hub) and #591 (demand board).


This repo is using Opire - what does it mean? 👇
💵 Everyone can add rewards for this issue commenting /reward 100 (replace 100 with the amount).
🕵️‍♂️ If someone starts working on this issue to earn the rewards, they can comment /try to let everyone know!
🙌 And when they open the PR, they can comment /claim #604 either in the PR description or in a PR's comment.

🪙 Also, everyone can tip any user commenting /tip 20 @Ikalus1988 (replace 20 with the amount, and @Ikalus1988 with the user to tip).

📖 If you want to learn more, check out our documentation.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    agent-friendlyIssue has clear file path, commands, and expected outputbountypool:deepInfrastructure, CI, MCP, integration — needs designpriority:nextNext up when current work finishesreadystatus:competitionCompetition issue — agents compete, best PR wins

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions