-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Prove continuity of map K_v -> L_w #215
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
feat: Prove continuity of map K_v -> L_w #215
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One of the sorries is false right now, as far as I can see.
Can one of you write a message just saying claim in #204 ? |
If you're against merging with a false sorry, then I suggest we wait a week or two for my refactor(s) to hit mathlib. It's quite inconvenient to work around. |
I'm definitely against merging with a false sorry! Sorry :-) |
Actually, this PR has a net count of 1 - 1 = 0 new false sorries ;) |
Yes but that doesn't stop me objecting to the addition of a new false sorry: I don't think total count is meaningful here. In fact the old false sorry (my fault -- a sign error) is removed on main already (which presumably is the cause of the conflict) |
0c8d1e1
to
a907e0f
Compare
Somehow when I merged master it overwrote the new version of the file without telling me. I'll revert what I spot |
a907e0f
to
9dd3300
Compare
…e refactored in Mathlib
da97d09
to
1dda44d
Compare
Code dictated by Yaël
Closes #204