You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Presently there is no support when a enumerated value is used only for reading or writing.
Describe the solution you'd like
Create separated type for value required to write and/or read a bitfield value. The same type shall be used for reading and writing in case that all enumerated labels are used for both reading and writing
Describe alternatives you've considered
Keep as it is and ignore bitfield that has tag so there is no conflict in case the same label is used for read and write but with different value and/or description
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Presently there is no support when a enumerated value is used only for reading or writing.
Describe the solution you'd like
Create separated type for value required to write and/or read a bitfield value. The same type shall be used for reading and writing in case that all enumerated labels are used for both reading and writing
Describe alternatives you've considered
Keep as it is and ignore bitfield that has tag so there is no conflict in case the same label is used for read and write but with different value and/or description
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: