Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Seppe Vansteelant: Does the use of Delegation take the Belgian legislation into account? #36

Open
michaelgeamanu opened this issue Sep 1, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@michaelgeamanu
Copy link
Collaborator

Voor wat de entiteit ‘Delegation’ betreft zal je rekening moeten houden met de gebruikelijke Belgische regels van vertegenwoordiging (wettelijk, gerechtelijk of conventioneel) lijkt me, om na te gaan of iemand rechtsgeldig voor een andere persoon toestemming kan verlenen.

@GeertThijs
Copy link
Contributor

GeertThijs commented Sep 14, 2022

This seems to be an implementation issue rather than a modelling issue. Delegation just means that someone else is asked for and/or has given Consent for the DataSubject. Implementations should make sure that the proper Persons are allowed to be delegates for the Datasubject by means of proper identification and checks of their delegation rights. The latter can be provided by the Consent.isContingentOn association with Criterion.

@GeertThijs
Copy link
Contributor

REMARK: in DPV there is another way to deal with Delegation. Via Consent.isIndicatedBy the Person who actually gave the Consent can be given. And this can be different of the DataSubject, the person whose PersonalData is being handled. The relation between both persons (like isParentFrom and alike) is given by hasRelationWithDataSubject. In our remapping excersise (see issue #46) the model was adpated as such.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants