Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consent.isContingentOn association is missing #44

Open
GeertThijs opened this issue Sep 14, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Consent.isContingentOn association is missing #44

GeertThijs opened this issue Sep 14, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@GeertThijs
Copy link
Contributor

The association Consent.isContingentOn is visible on the UML class diagram but is missing in the specification. Plausible reasons: the association has no external uri (= no uri-tag) and there is no alternative package-tag to tell the toolchain which package is going to privide the baseURI necessary to form the associations uri.
@GeertThijs
Copy link
Contributor Author

REMARK: in the remapped version these relations are not present as DPV has another solutiuon for this. See the modelling report mentioned in issue #46 for more detail.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@GeertThijs