You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In our current implementation: e.g tree:GeospatialFragmentation. A tree structure is generated as:
To arrive at thetree:Node which contains tree:members (in current case: http://localhost:8080/kbo/by-location?tile=15/16899/11116&pageNumber=1).
Needs to go through generic relation: tree:Relation .
This path requires saving the status of the compared value of the tree:member back to the last Semantic Relation (tree:GeospatiallyContainsRelation), In this current case where 1 marked
My idea here is, that I feel it is important to have a semantic meaning for relations to reach the Node which contains the LDES members.
Like this, it is easier to know which values should be contained inside the member.
Basically something like this:
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
LDES Server version: ldes/ldes-server:2.0.1-SNAPSHOT
This is a follow-up case for the discussion on whether should we have lateral relations on SLACK: https://vsdscore.slack.com/archives/C03DHRBGDQ9/p1695036769839969
Testbed is made for checking if the member in the
tree:Node
linked in atree:Relation
(with its subclasses) conforms the relation statement.e.g. for Geolocation: e.g.https://github.com/Informatievlaanderen/VSDS-Testbed/blob/main/test-services/src/main/java/be/vlaanderen/ldes/handlers/RelationGeospatialValidationHandler.java
In our current implementation: e.g
tree:GeospatialFragmentation
. A tree structure is generated as:To arrive at the
tree:Node
which containstree:members
(in current case: http://localhost:8080/kbo/by-location?tile=15/16899/11116&pageNumber=1).Needs to go through generic relation:
tree:Relation
.This path requires saving the status of the compared value of the
tree:member
back to the last Semantic Relation (tree:GeospatiallyContainsRelation), In this current case where 1 markedMy idea here is, that I feel it is important to have a semantic meaning for relations to reach the Node which contains the LDES members.
Like this, it is easier to know which values should be contained inside the member.
Basically something like this:
Thanks
Please feel free to leave comment
Miro: https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVMiATqP8=/?share_link_id=273030385087
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions