You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The second Wang-Landau program (which achieve flatness for any N value) delivers a wrong output. However, if we exclude very high and very low points from the graphic, we obtain a figure similar to the one produced by the exact calculation, performed by 'dos_mean.py' (see 'code' and 'images' folders), just in another scale. I have checked manually for N=3 if there was any issue related to the summation of degenerated energies but this part seems to work fine, so I guess the problem is in the Wang-Landau itself.
Comparing the results obtained by the 2 Wang-Landau codes and the exact calculation for N=14, we can observe that the first sampling matches the exact result (just need to substract the minimum to all values for identical results, and this readjustment is always necessary for Wang-Landau).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The second Wang-Landau program (which achieve flatness for any N value) delivers a wrong output. However, if we exclude very high and very low points from the graphic, we obtain a figure similar to the one produced by the exact calculation, performed by 'dos_mean.py' (see 'code' and 'images' folders), just in another scale. I have checked manually for N=3 if there was any issue related to the summation of degenerated energies but this part seems to work fine, so I guess the problem is in the Wang-Landau itself.
Comparing the results obtained by the 2 Wang-Landau codes and the exact calculation for N=14, we can observe that the first sampling matches the exact result (just need to substract the minimum to all values for identical results, and this readjustment is always necessary for Wang-Landau).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: